Biblical Evidences
“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” Gen 1:1
God created everything from nothing: Time, Space, Matter
Then God said, “Let the earth sprout vegetation…Then God said, “Let the waters teem with swarms of living creatures…Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth living creatures…: cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth…Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image” Gen 1:11-26
God Created Life from nothing. No room in scriptures for Abiogenesis (life-self generating)!
Then God said, “Let the earth sprout vegetation…after their kind…and the earth brought forth vegetation…after their kind…with seed in them after their kind…” “Let the waters teem with swarms of living things… after their kind and every winged bird after its kind,..” “Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind… beast of the earth after their kind…God made beasts of the earth after their kind, and the cattle after their kind, and everything that creeps on the ground after its kind. Gen 1 Gen 1
No room in scripture for macroevolution! Development of new kinds
If the Bible’s Creation Account is true, what would you EXPECT to see?
1. Matter Self-Generated from Nothing
The Big-Bang Theory (BBT) is the Standard Cosmological Model for explaining the origin of the universe. It is a Ruling Theorem which is one that does not allow any other theorem to be considered, no matter what the observations show, they are fit into the theorem or the theorem is modified. The BBT is based upon observations that galaxies are expanding which if reversed you reach time 0 when they exploded into existence. However, this theory holds that matter suddenly self-generated from nothing. Only God can generate matter from nothing and He set Laws for how matter and energy function.
The BBT does not explain the origin of the galaxies, only their expansion which the Bible (Is 45:12 and 51:13, Jeremiah 10:12 and 51:15) declared thousands of years before the Hubble telescope discovery.
Edward Tryon proposed that the universe came about through a “quantum fluctuation” which is the temporary appearance of energetic particles out of a vacuum of nothingness which defies the Laws God established.
Law of Conservation of Mass states that matter can neither be created nor destroyed.
1st Law of Thermodynamics states that the energy can neither be created or destroyed.
2. Abiogenesis Scientifically Disproven
Abiogenesis is a core tenet of evolution. That is the belief that life self-generated from non-living matter by random natural processes as a result of chemical reactions occurring in a primordial pool of slime. The Miller-Urey (M/U) experiments in the 1950s were designed to prove life could self-generate from a pool of chemicals on early prebiotic earth by random natural processes. However, they applied extensive intelligence and laboratory control to design and execute experiments to simulate the chemical origin of life. What did they find?
M/U experiments failed to produce life, only produced non-living chemical compounds from non-living chemicals.
They produced a few of the Amino Acids found in life forms but as right and left-handed AAs which chirality demands cannot result in life.
Experiments by Louis Pasteur (The Father of Bacteriology) disproved the theory of spontaneous generation that held that living creatures could arise from nonliving matter.
.
The Law of Biogenesis: Living things ONLY come from pre-existing living things! In nature, we have never seen a single exception to this basic law of science.
Nobel Laureate George Wald stated “I do not want to believe in God. Therefore, I chose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible: spontaneous generation [of life] arising to evolution.”
3. Microevolution Does Not Produce Macroevolution
Macroevolution is the idea that life progressively developed from primitive forms to more advance forms by natural selection. It is the Descent from a Common Ancestor theory or Goo to You Theory which is a fundamental tenet of evolution. The idea is that given enough time, small changes in DNA by mutations (adaptation) can produce large changes (new creatures) by Natural Selection. Is this supported by observations?
Natural Selection is a real process that results in certain selected traits producing a new species. Species are special kinds of creatures BUT not new Kinds!
Speciation is a loss of genetic information, not the development of new genetic information which macroevolution requires.
God created life with the genetic diversity to adapt (speciation) to changing environments but with boundaries that prevent the reproduction of new kinds (macroevolution).
Macroevolution has NEVER been observed!
4. Mutations Are All Bad
Evolution proposes that life forms go from simple to complex (improve with time) but the Bible claims life was originally perfect and because of the curse for sin life forms have gone from good to bad to worse. Mutations obey the 2nd law of thermodynamics which agrees with the Bible that chaos increases with time, i.e., things deteriorate. As such mutations do not produce new useful genetic information and leading evolutionists recognize this fact.
Dr. H. Muller, a Nobel prize-winning mutation expert stated that: “good ones [mutations] are so rare that we can consider them all bad.”
Evolutionist Pierre-Paul Grasse wrote in ‘Evolution of Living Organisms’ that: “Mutations do not produce any kind of evolution.”
Mutations DO NOT produce new, useful genetic information (macroevolution), it produces DISEASE & DEATH!
Time is not the Hero; the longer the time, the more defects accumulate.!
5. Where are the Transitions?
What did Darwin himself say about his theory of speciation by natural selection? Darwin (1872) “Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitions forms? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined? But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must (have) existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory.”
Stephen Gould “The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution.”
Steven Stanley, “the fossil record fails to document a single example of phyletic evolution.”
Dr. Patterson “I fully agree with your comments about the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them… I will lay it on the line, there is not one such fossil.”
Darwin was right, the Fossil Record should be filled with Transitional Forms but there is not even one as evolutionists admit!
If Macroevolution Were True, the earth would be filled with transitions and the fossil record filled with failed forms!
6. Irreducible Complexity
For macroevolution to occur, new and useful genetic information must be generated for all components of the new trait from the beginning for it to be functional, and therefore, an advantageous new trait. If any single component, no matter how minute, is not fully functional from the start then the new trait does not work and it is a detriment to the living organisms. This is called “irreducible complexity.” How does evolution know all the components needed beforehand if it is random natural processes. Remember “all mutations are bad.”
Darwin admitted, from the intricacies of the eye and how every component must function for the eye to work, that his theory was absurd.
Darwin “To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable (defying imitation) contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.”
The “numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect (Darwin)” have never been found in the fossil record.
7. Micro to Macro Mechanisms Missing
By what mechanism can microevolution produce macroevolution if mutations are bad and accumulate. At the 1980 Conference of the world’s leading Evolutionary Biologist at Chicago Field Museum of Natural History, Roger Lewin wrote as a review “The central question of the Chicago conference was whether the mechanisms underlying microevolution can be extrapolated to explain the phenomena of macroevolution. At the risk of doing violence to the positions of some of the people at the meeting, the answer can be given as a clear, No.”
There is no proven mechanism that can explain the formation of the large quantities of new genetic information!
Biophysicist Dr. Lee Spetner points out that this type of evolution—macroevolution—has never been observed.
