Old Earth is a Lie
You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it. John 8:44
Explore this question about the age of the fossils
Have you ever been told that “Carbon dating said this fossil or layer or cave formation was xxx million of years old?” Is this true and how should you respond?

Carbon occurs in several stable forms. The most common by far is 12C and lesser extent 13C. As Cosmic Rays penetrate out atmosphere, it converts stable nitrogen (14N) into unstable 14C. The unstable14C combines with oxygen to make carbon dioxide (14CO2) which is taken up by plants. As animals consume the plants they take in 14C & 12C from the plants. When they die they stop taking in 14C & 12C. Since 14C is unstable, it begins to decay but 12C is stable and stays the same. Thus, the ratio of 14C to 12C decreases with time after death. Knowing the change in 14C/12C and the decay rate of 14C one can calculate the time it has been dead.
Because the atmosphere today is only <one-billionth% 14C, Carbon dating is only good to <100,000 years max!
Thought Provoking Assumptions
1
Rate of Decay
The rate of decay of 14C back to 14N has always been the same as measured today.
2
Atmosphere
Assume that the 14C/12C ratio in the atmosphere is the same everywhere and has been the same today as forever.
3
Plants & Animals
The 14C/12C ratio in all living things (plants and animals) is the same as in the atmosphere today.
4
Closed System
No 14C or 12C permeates into or leached out of the specimen after its death.
Problems with Carbon-Dating
Earth’s Magnetic Field
The earth’s magnetic field has been rapidly weakening since creation. Therefore, before the flood, the magnetic field would be higher than today and repel more cosmic rays and produce less 14C.
Low 14C/12C is not due to object being old but because it started with low 14C

Preflood Biosphere
Before the flood, the biosphere would have 500 times more vegetation to store carbon than today. This would dilute the 14C taken up by plants such that 14C/12C consumed by animals would be MUCH smaller than today.
Age estimate would be 10x the true age!

Isotope Affect
Reactions and behavior of the isotope are affected by the atom’s size. There is an isotope affect in plant uptake with a preference for 12C. Thus, lower 14C/12C in plant than atmosphere.
Low 14C/12C is not due to object being old but because it started with low 14C

Plant & Animal Affects
-Plants have distinct differences in C uptake between C3, C4 and CAM type plants and once taken in by plants, 14C & 12C is transported through the plant and stored among the plant compartments (stems, lower leaves, upper leaves…). There can be differences in 14C/12C among plant parts and carbon storage changes with stage of growth and age of the plants.
-Animals have preferences for certain plants over other plants and for certain plant parts (fresh leaves over old leaves and/or stems).
The Assumptions of Carbon Dating are Simply Bogus!
For additional problems with Carbon-dating see 1. Biddle (2018)

1 Thes 5:21 “Examine (test) everything carefully, hold fast to that which is good”
The British Science and Engineering Research Council
Conducted an international blind-test by sending artifacts of “known age” to 38 of the world’s leading radiocarbon testing laboratories.
-“Only 7 out of 38 laboratories produced satisfactory results”
-“the margin of error for the known age was 2-3 times greater than the technique’s practitioners claim.”
-Nature magazine “published a demonstration that the radiocarbon technique is not only unsound but also outdated.”
“How can carbon dating be regarded as scientifically reliable and accurate when 0 of 38 laboratories “achieved a correct date, even with plus or minus tolerances, and many were off by thousands of years”? (1) Biddle, 2018

Carbon dating is only good to < 100,000 yrs
YET
14C is found in all coal samples, all diamonds, and all dinosaur bones tested (6)
If C-dating cannot be validated with subjects of known death-dates, why trust it with unknown subjects?
No Validation-No Confidence-No Use!
1. D.A. Biddle. 2018. Answers to the Top 50 Questions about Genesis, Creation, and Noah’s Flood. ISBN-13: 978-1727870305.
2. W. Dort. 1971. Mummified Seals of Southern Victoria Land, Antarctic Journal of the U.S., p. 210.
3. B. Huber. 1958. Recording Gaseous Exchange Under Field Conditions, ed. by K. V. Thimann, Physiology of Forest Trees.
4. M. Keith and G. Anderson. 1963. Radiocarbon Dating: Fictitious Results with Mollusk Shells, Science, 141, p. 634
5. A. Snelling. 2008. Radiocarbon ages for fossil ammonites and wood in Cretaceous strata near Redding, California. Answers Research J., 1:123-144.
6. J. Baumgardner, A. Snelling, R. Humphreys, and A. Austin, 2003. Measurable 14C in Fossilized Organic Materials: Confirming the Young Earth Creation-flood Model”, (ed.) R.L. Ivey Jr., Fifth International Conference on Creationism, Creation Science Fellowship, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. www.icr.org/article/young-earth-creation-flood-14c/
